And then of course correct for it in post-production. And then I decided to underexpose by four stops, run it through the same test, magnify it, and compare it. And I was hoping that I might see some difference in the highlight areas that I could recover, and I really didn't see any notable difference between them. And I'm gonna magnify it, and compare the two options between uncompressed and lossless compressed. I then corrected for it in post-production. Yes, this picture is slightly overexposed. And this is where I overexposed the image by four stops. And so I wanted to run it through a really hardcore test. So this lossless compressed image sure seems like the smart way to go because it's half the file size. Do you see any quality difference between this? And I look back and forth, and I could pick out a few little differences, but I couldn't really say that they were better or worse. Gonna shoot my standard little subject that's got some highlights, it has some shadows, it has some details. And so I wanted to try it again, and I went into the studio. Now I've examined these images very, very closely, and I could not find any significant difference between these, which means that when they say lossless compressed, there really is no loss of quality. The lossless compressed will be about half the size. Now an uncompressed image is gonna be about 50 megabytes in size. We're looking for noise, highlights, shadow areas. Because we're kind of looking for sharpness. This intrigued me quite a bit, so I needed to go out and shoot a test sample and see okay, what's the difference between uncompressed and lossless compressed when I shoot an image in the detail of the image.
![double exposure x-t2 double exposure x-t2](https://www.thephoblographer.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Chris-Gampat-The-Phoblographer-Canon-5D-Mk-IV-review-product-images-35mm-f2.8-ISO-400-1-60s35CanonCanon-EOS-6D-EF16-35mm-f-2.8L-III-USM-10.jpg)
![double exposure x-t2 double exposure x-t2](https://lociphotography.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Double-Exposure-Header.png)
And this is the uncompressed option or the lossless compressed.
![double exposure x-t2 double exposure x-t2](https://fstoplounge.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/ASG_2014-1860-Edit-1.jpg)
#Double exposure x t2 pdf
And you will see that on the PDF handout that comes with the class as well. So anything is red is for a little bit more advanced user. Or something else might be a little bit different about it.
#Double exposure x t2 manual
But somebody who is a little bit more advanced is gonna prefer a little bit different setting that might have more manual settings. And it's just that we come across certain types of menu settings where I'll think, yeah, this is pretty good for most people. Now as we go through this, you'll notice my recommendations on the right hand side of the menu, and the ones that are for the more advanced users in red. And so I like using that simply for that play back option. The RAWs have an embedded lower res JPEG for use in the camera, which have a lower magnification in the play back. You get that 100% magnification where you can go in and check sharpness.
#Double exposure x t2 plus
If you recall earlier, one of the reasons that I like to shoot RAW plus JPEG is that when you shoot JPEGs. But many people like to have access to the RAWs, the original information from the camera. For many people, the JPEGs are perfectly good out of this camera.
![double exposure x-t2 double exposure x-t2](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/VwMoMSmB08w/maxresdefault.jpg)
This is where you get to choose RAW or JPEG. And so large 3:2 is gonna be our standard setting under image size. And you'll probably want to be in the large, unless you very specifically know you do not need the large. Most people are gonna want to be in the 3:2 aspect ratio, because that is the ratio of the sensor itself. So if you hit the menu button, and you go to the left, and you go up and down, you want to get yourself to the image quality, which is the top item in the menu.